Signature
A set of sets of arguments is realisable under a semantics iff there is an AF with . The signature of is is realisable under .
Properties of sets of extensions
For a set of sets of arguments, let , for some and for some (Dunne et al., 2015). Then is
- downward-closed iff (see Downward Closure),
- incomparable iff for all , implies (see I-Maximality),
- tight iff for all and with there is with (see Tightness),
- conflict-sensitive iff for all with there are with (see Conflict-Sensitiveness),
- com-closed iff for every with for all , has exactly one -minimal superset in (see Com-Closure).
Known Signatures
| iff | Source |
|---|
| , downward-closed and tight | (Dunne et al., 2015) |
| , incomparable and is tight | (Dunne et al., 2015) |
| is incomparable and tight | (Dunne et al., 2015) |
| , incomparable and tight | (Dunne et al., 2015) |
| and is conflict-sensitive | (Dunne et al., 2015) |
| , | , incomparable and conflict-sensitive | (Dunne et al., 2015) |
| | (Dunne et al., 2015) |
| , | | (Dunne et al., 2016) |
| is decomposable | (Dunne, 2020) |
Reference
Dunne, P.E., Dvořák, W., Linsbichler, T. & Woltran, S. (2015). Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 228, pp. 153–178.