Signature

A set S\mathbb{S} of sets of arguments is realisable under a semantics σ\sigma iff there is an AF FF with σ(F)=S\sigma(F) = \mathbb{S}. The signature of σ\sigma is sig(σ)={S∣S\mathsf{sig}(\sigma) = \{\mathbb{S} \mid \mathbb{S} is realisable under σ}\sigma\}.

Properties of sets of extensions

For a set S\mathbb{S} of sets of arguments, let ArgsS=⋃S∈SS\mathrm{Args}_\mathbb{S} = \bigcup_{S \in \mathbb{S}} S, PairsS={(a,b)∣{a,b}⊆S\mathrm{Pairs}_\mathbb{S} = \{(a,b) \mid \{a,b\} \subseteq S for some S∈S}S \in \mathbb{S}\} and dclS={S′∣S′⊆S\mathrm{dcl}_\mathbb{S} = \{S' \mid S' \subseteq S for some S∈S}S \in \mathbb{S}\} (Dunne et al., 2015). Then S\mathbb{S} is

  • downward-closed iff S=dclS\mathbb{S} = \mathrm{dcl}_\mathbb{S} (see Downward Closure),
  • incomparable iff for all S,S′∈SS, S' \in \mathbb{S}, S⊆S′S \subseteq S' implies S=S′S = S' (see I-Maximality),
  • tight iff for all S∈SS \in \mathbb{S} and a∈ArgsSa \in \mathrm{Args}_\mathbb{S} with S∪{a}∉SS \cup \{a\} \notin \mathbb{S} there is b∈Sb \in S with (a,b)∉PairsS(a,b) \notin \mathrm{Pairs}_\mathbb{S} (see Tightness),
  • conflict-sensitive iff for all S,S′∈SS, S' \in \mathbb{S} with S∪S′∉SS \cup S' \notin \mathbb{S} there are a,b∈S∪S′a, b \in S \cup S' with (a,b)∉PairsS(a,b) \notin \mathrm{Pairs}_\mathbb{S} (see Conflict-Sensitiveness),
  • com-closed iff for every T⊆S\mathbb{T} \subseteq \mathbb{S} with (a,b)∈PairsS(a,b) \in \mathrm{Pairs}_\mathbb{S} for all a,b∈ArgsTa, b \in \mathrm{Args}_\mathbb{T}, ArgsT\mathrm{Args}_\mathbb{T} has exactly one ⊆\subseteq-minimal superset in S\mathbb{S} (see Com-Closure).

Known Signatures

σ\sigmaS∈sig(σ)\mathbb{S} \in \mathsf{sig}(\sigma) iffSource
cf\mathsf{cf}S≠∅\mathbb{S} \neq \emptyset, downward-closed and tight(Dunne et al., 2015)
na\mathsf{na}S≠∅\mathbb{S} \neq \emptyset, incomparable and dclS\mathrm{dcl}_\mathbb{S} is tight(Dunne et al., 2015)
st\mathsf{st}S\mathbb{S} is incomparable and tight(Dunne et al., 2015)
stg\mathsf{stg}S≠∅\mathbb{S} \neq \emptyset, incomparable and tight(Dunne et al., 2015)
ad\mathsf{ad}∅∈S\emptyset \in \mathbb{S} and S\mathbb{S} is conflict-sensitive(Dunne et al., 2015)
pr\mathsf{pr}, sst\mathsf{sst}S≠∅\mathbb{S} \neq \emptyset, incomparable and conflict-sensitive(Dunne et al., 2015)
gr\mathsf{gr}∣S∣=1\lvert\mathbb{S}\rvert = 1(Dunne et al., 2015)
id\mathsf{id}, ea\mathsf{ea}∣S∣=1\lvert\mathbb{S}\rvert = 1(Dunne et al., 2016)
sad\mathsf{sad}S\mathbb{S} is decomposable(Dunne, 2020)

Reference

Dunne, P.E., Dvořák, W., Linsbichler, T. & Woltran, S. (2015). Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 228, pp. 153–178.

Referenced by